While the IT sector no longer commands the valuations it did a few years back, with growth tapering down and valuations following, there are some companies in this sector which, though not large, excel at what they do. They have mastered certain domains and skills from the environment in which they grew and have made them their own calling cards. Some of these companies have attracted the right kind of attention globally while others are still striving for it.
Oracle Financial Services Software (formerly iflex Solutions and
CITIL prior to that) was formed out of COSL (Citicorp Overseas Software Ltd., a
captive for Citigroup) in 1991. While COSL's mandate was to serve Citicorp’s
internal needs globally and be a cost center, CITIL's mandate was to be
profitable by serving not only Citicorp but the whole global financial software
market. As is well known Oracle bought Citigroup's 44% stake in the then i-flex
solutions in Aug. ’05, a further 7.52% in March and April ‘06, and 3.2% in an
open-market purchase in mid-April ’06. In January ‘07, after an open offer
price to minority shareholders, Oracle increased its stake in i-flex to around
83%.
The main interest of investors
and market players is waiting for Oracle to delist this company as the valuations
are not exactly cheap here quoting at more than 20 times earnings though growth
has not kept pace in the same proportion.
Kale Consultants was incorporated way back in 1986 by
technocrat entrepreneurs, Mr. Narendra Kale (who later founded Patni as well as
Silverline) and Mr. Vipul Jain who till date heads the company (even after the
takeover by Accelya, a Spain-headquartered BPO
company). It is one of the few mid-sized Indian IT firms serving customers in
the airline, logistics and travel industries, and has most of the airlines as
its customers using its flagship product for their core operations.
It attracted the attention of
Accelya after about 25 years during which time it consolidated its operations (it
sold off its banking division, which was mainly into services, to Polaris a few
years back) and established firm focus on the niche travel and aviation domain.
Its fortunes now will be dictated by how it works with Accelya and manages to
be in its priority list. However, considering that Accelya now has a significant
cost advantage in getting its work done thru Kale, the company should do well
ahead. The only major risk could be the step motherly treatment it may receive
from its parent the way Mphasis did from its parent HP in terms of pricing and
more recently Patni from iGate (thankfully iGate paid a premium to get it
delisted recently and it may have a level playing field if it is fully merged
into the parent; that it got delisted recently doesn’t automatically mean that it
will merge with iGate).
Besides the above, who have already attracted global attention, there
are a few small IT product companies, strictly small cap, which could attract
the attention of global players in their domain at some point in time (more
likely a few years) with their niche products and skill sets.
Polaris Financial Technology (earlier known as Polaris Software
Labs), headquartered in Chennai, was setup in 1993 to cater exclusively to the
requirements of Citibank. In 1994, they implemented an end-end Retail banking
solution for Citi Bank India. Gaining from this experience, they set up more
development centers to cater to the banking sector technology needs as also
exclusively for Citibank. In 2003 they acquired OrbiTech, a Citigroup subsidiary.
Through this acquisition, they acquired the Intellect suite of products (mostly
surround banking applications such as Lending) and formalized this brand as
their flagship. All their products were and are now being launched under this
brand. Besides the products, they also have supporting practices in the
financial sector such technology services and consulting which contribute a
significant part of their business. The company has since moved away from having
Citi as a sole customer and has a large number of global banks and FS firms as
their customers.
Citigroup through Orbitech merger
and on its own has a stake of about 30% in the company. Franklin Templeton
holds about 5% in the company. Institutional holding at 33% is quite high and
within this, FIIs own nearly 22%, rest being with domestic financial firms such
as insurance companies and mutual funds.
The main trigger for Polaris
would be when Citigroup looks to exit it by selling its 20% stake. There would surely
be many suitors for this stake since the buyer would not only inherit a great
set of products but also strong domain expertise in the FS sector, A while
back, there was rumor that IBM was eyeing this stake, but nothing came of it. However,
interest of other biggies in Polaris can’t be yet ruled out since there are
firms like HP without a significant application products portfolio and CSC
which is primarily into Insurance. The stock, along with the rest of the midcap
IT stocks has been beaten down much more than warranted and is now quoting in
single digit PE multiples.
Four Soft is a small company in Supply Chain Logistics space
with some marquee customers like DHL, Maersk which are leaders in logistics
space. That these companies have bought its products for their core operations
speaks well of the company. Its other products include solutions for etc. They
have product suites addressing a lot of areas of the supply chain such as freight
forwarding and logistics, extended warehouse management, customs brokerage,
shipping line execution etc which can be bought in a modular manner and
implemented. Promoters (P. Srikanth Reddy and associates) hold about 30% in the
company with PSR himself holding about 22%, Kotak Mahindra VC fund hold about
10%, Ashish Dhawan (former head of PE Chrys Capital) personally holds about
3.6% of the stake. The company came out with an IPO in 2004 and is still in its
growth phase and hence has not shown any worthwhile results to speak of.
Considering the niche area it operates in, it may be worthwhile to keep an eye
on it in the coming years. But being a small cap, there will be the usual
issues of corporate governance, transparency etc and it might be some years
before it catches anyone’s eye. But when it does, the returns could be
bountiful.
Take Solutions is a global technology solutions and service
provider, with significant focus across two principal business areas – Life
Sciences and Supply Chain Management.
Started in the year 2000, TAKE
has grown exponentially over the decade and is today represented by over 750
employees catering to more than 390 marquee clients across 6 countries. With
its global headquarters located at Chennai, India and US headquarters at
Princeton, NJ, TAKE makes its global presence felt through its well-established
offices across North America, European Union, Asia Pacific, Middle-East and
South-East Asia. In the Life Sciences space, Cadila Pharmaceuticals, Reliance
Life Sciences, Indoco Remedies, NATCO are some of their customers in India
while they claim to serve Novartis, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson abroad.
4 years ago, there was a proposal
to merge both Take Solutions and Four Soft due to the overlap in their Supply
Chain and Logistics domain which did not take off due to valuation issues.
Recently Take has started focusing
on the current hot technology of cloud computing.
The company has designed a cloud-based product for SME for effective
management of information flows covering the entire supply chain structure. They
have already tied up with Amway and Toshiba for the product. The company feels
the global logistics and supply chain market will be looking for specialized
software that focuses on continued technology advancement.
Four Soft and Take Solutions are
more or less in an identical space with Take having an added area of Life
Sciences, though how much progress it makes in this specialized area remains to
be seen. Four Soft is competing with companies such as Kale Consultants and
Take Solutions in the Logistics space.
Subex is again a much focused company in the telecom domain
and has been battered over the last few years due to the travails of the global
telecom industry. Even so, it has quite a few of the global telecom giants as
its customers. Its most celebrated products are in Revenue Assurance and Fraud Management
and Credit Risk Management applications for telecom operators.
It came out with an IPO in July ’99
@75/share and since then has given 2 bonuses – first in Aug ’00 and then in Feb
’06, both times 1:1. In spite of this, its equity is not too high @69 crores.
So in that sense it has been investor friendly. It is only the global environment
that has led to its sorry state of affairs. That it did not deviate from its
focus area is a commendable thing (as some firms did over the last 10 years
especially in times of global crises; shifting to flavor of the season from Y2K
to ERP to open systems and whatever was in vogue at a particular time and took
their fancy). It is quoting at a P/E of about 14 which is quite high for a
midcap company and that too focused on the telecom domain. But once its
immediate troubles are over, it should be on its way to stability.
That it hasn’t
been acquired yet is not really a surprise because the global telecom industry
has not had a smooth 5 or 10 year run in the last 10 years and the likely
acquirers themselves were in a spot during such times. However during this period, it acquired a few small companies across US and Europe with mixed success - UK-based Azure Solutions in 2006 was a great success, the Canadian telecom software firm, Syndesis Ltd in March 2007 for $164 million (funded through $180 million of FCCBs maturing in March 2012 later became a millstone around Subex' neck). The
acquisition of Syndesis turned bad at the height of the financial crisis in 2008,
when Syndesis clients failed to place orders as expected, making it look
overpriced. Revenue at Syndesis, projected at $50 million for the 2008 fiscal,
turned out to be half that. The FCCBs that were due for conversion into
equity by March 2012 at Rs656/share, or redeemed at a total $245
million, accentuated the distress. The Subex stock was beaten down to
as low as Rs18 in mid-March 2009 from an all-time high of Rs803 in
mid-January 2007.
The main issue which hung over
the stock, was the repayment of USD 130 million of FCCBs.
RBI has now cleared their proposal to restructure these bonds over another 5
years. So the current set of FCCBS which were maturing on July 9 will now be
extended/rolled-over for another 5 years at competitive interest rates currently
prevailing and Subex will save quite a chunk on their annual interest outgo.
Once the bondholders clear this proposal over the next 2 months, things should
look up for this.
Promoters hold nearly 12% stake and among its main shareholders are the Govt of Singapore with close to 6.5%, and Rakesh Jhunjhunwala with nearly 2%.
Geodesic operates in a niche area of developing various
innovative products in the ICE (Information, Communication and Entertainment)
space. Geodesic, owing to its inventive capabilities across all aspects of
communication and collaboration, is widely recognized for its pioneering
universal instant messaging system which is a scalable content, contact
management, presence, real-time communication and collaboration platform. The
company offers its products and services under the "Mundu brand name for
the retail segment. The company has effectively used the above platform to
build and deploy innovative front-end applications, viz. Mundu Instant
Messenger(IM services including AIM, ICO, MSN, Yahoo and G Talk on the web,
desktop and smart mobile phones), Mundu Radio (allows users to tune into
thousands of internet radio stations on their mobile phone), Mundu Speak (VOIP
on Mobile), Montage, etc., for the retail segment.
The company has redefined a
seamless user experience across content and communication. Sometime back, they
acquired Chandamama - a 60 year old children's magazine, which is in the
process of being digitized and mobilized as part of the company's vision to
draw in multimedia content. Geodesic has signed several agreements with leading
Radio stations, TV Channels, Cell companies and Movie production houses to
further Chandamama's foray into these exciting new digital mediums
Fidelity thru its various arms holds
about 10% stake in the overall FII stake of about 33% (which itself is quite
high and reassuring). This along with other midcap IT stocks has been battered
down and is now quoting in single digit PE multiples. As and when it starts
unlocking value in its products either thru direct sale or thru partnerships
with global biggies, its fortunes should improve significantly.
Recently this space of communication
and collaboration has attracted the interest of several social networking
players such as LinkedIn and Facebook (Glancee just a few days back, Tagtile,
Instagram a short while back). So it would be interesting to see how the
promoters take Geodesic forward.
There may be other companies too claiming
niche in certain areas without actually having anything to show for it. For
e.g. take the case of e-governance. I am not sure how this can be called a
niche when all you are doing is automating a department in a public or private
sector firm or for a government. It is after all a service that is provided and
the IT service firm next door is likely to provide it as well as anyone else.
The tools and technologies used are also not something requiring a great deal
of specialized knowledge for anyone to claim sole superiority in their usage.
So that would exclude from my list firms like Mastek and NIIT Tech among others
who claim to be a niche player in this area.
i-flex was formed in 1991; so it
took about 15 years for a small company like i-flex to come to the notice of a
large global IT company like Oracle. So these companies are only for the very
patient ones who can stomach a few years of ups and downs as surely there would
be. And there is no guarantee either that all of these will hit pay-dirt over
that period. But even if a couple of them click, it may be worth the wait.
After all i-flex came out with an IPO only in June ’02 @530/share and has
multiplied 5 times in the period since, primarily due to Oracle acquisition.
In the last 4 months since this article, quite a few of the above companies have declared their results and some of them have been astounding with Geometric leading the pack with a near 63% jump in net profits, followed closely by Kale @50%. Oracle also delivered a good growth. While it remains to be seen if these were just one-offs or will sustain in the coming quarters, it is an interesting thing to note that these niche companies do not rely on a linear model of growth i.e. growth proportional to the rise in number of employees. Kale and Geometric have publicly stated this while Oracle also appears to do the same though in the case of the latter, the recent re-structuring of the Services division could play a part.
ReplyDeleteWith the economy and technology being what they are today, pure-play commodity services businesses will be hard put to survive in the years ahead. Though Infy as been pillories by all and sundry for a lack of growth, by their own admission, they are not interested in growth as much as they are in profitability i.e. growth will not come at the cost of profits. And that is what sustainability is all about. And that is where these niche companies will count.